GroVia Bamboo/Cotton Prefold Review

When it comes to cloth diapers, bamboo is my absorbent material of choice. Most of my favorite diapers use some type of bamboo (bamboo fleece, bamboo terry, bamboo french terry, etc.). When I would use my trusty cotton prefolds to tri-fold into a cover, I would find myself thinking that a bamboo prefold would totally rock! You can imagine my excitement when GroVia announced their bamboo/cotton blend prefolds. Unfortunately for me, my littlest was nearly done potty training so it didn’t make sense for me to buy any. Luckily for you though, Kissed by The Moon included a size 2 GroVia prefold as a gift in my last order and the fantastic ladies on the Haute Clothed Buns review team were pretty excited to try it out and share their thoughts with you :)

Overview

GroVia prefolds are made of 55% Bamboo/45% organic cotton and the ends have been serged with vibrant thread.  The color of the serging identifies the size of the prefold:

  • Size 1: Newborn – 12 x 13 in. (2 x 6 x 2 ply)  $8/pack of 3
  • Size 2: Infant – 14 x 15.5 in. (4 x 8 x 4 ply) $12/pack of 3
  • Size 3: Infant Long – 15 x 18.5 in. (4 x 8 x 4 ply) $14/pack of 3
  • Size 4: Toddler – 6.5 x 20 in. (4 x 8 x 4 ply) $16/pack of 3
  • *Dimensions listed are before washing. Will shrink approximately 10%.

When GroVia says in their description that these diapers were designed with baby’s ultimate comfort in mind, you’d better believe it!  The prefold is one of the softest I (Anna) have ever felt.  Additionally, GroVia made the brilliant decision to stamp a label on the prefold instead of sewing a label on that could potentially cause irritation or discomfort.  Smart move!

The prefold can be used in GroVia Shells, other diaper covers like Flip, Capri, etc., or as a natural insert option for pocket diapers.  You can do traditional prefold folds (ie: jellyroll, angel wing, etc.) and pin them, or you can tri-fold the prefold and use it as an insert.  Size 2 works great for trifolding!

GroVia made this handy-dandy chart to illustrate the ways it can be used:
GroVia-prefold_diagram

Appearance

The prefold in the photos below has been prepped and used for about 3 weeks.photo 2photo 1

Performance

Since my littlest is basically potty trained, Kelly F. , one of the wonderful ladies on the HCB review team, and her little ones evaluated the GroVia Bamboo/Cotton prefold size 2 for this review.  Thanks Kelly!

Baby N:  11 months actual/7 months adjusted (Preemie); Weight: 15 lbs 6 oz; Height: 27 inches.

How does it fit through the rise? Across the bum? Through the crotch? Around the thighs?  I was only able to use the prefold trifolded (Anna’s note:  for folds that are pinned or snappi’d, you generally need a larger size than for prefolding–unless it’s for a tiny baby). The only issue I had was tri-folded the rise was a bit to high which caused issues with the cover bunching up in the front.

Did you find this diaper to be trim? Average? Bulky?
Average. It wasn’t trim, but I had no issues getting clothes to fit over the prefold tri-folded in a cover.

Does the bulk hind or impede mobility in any way?
No

ABSORBENCY:
Is your child a light, medium or heavy wetter?
Medium.

Did the diaper leak? If so describe (where, was it recurring, etc.).
The only time that we encountered leaking was when I attempted to use it overnight with a cover. By itself with the cover the prefold became over-saturated and stopped absorbing, causing the cover to leak through the PUL.

Does the diaper work for daytime? Naptime? Overnight?
Daytime: Great, no leaks.
Naptime: Great, no leaks.
Overnight: Did not work. See previous question.

Did you need to add additional absorbency for naps or night? What did you use?
Naps: This prefold was enough absorbency for naps.
Nighttime: This prefold was not enough absorbency overnight by itself. If I added a pad folded Osocozy flat on top we could make it through the night.

How does it compare absorbency wise to other diapers you’ve used?
The longest it lasted us was about 4 hours before it got pretty saturated and that’s about the longest I’ve ever been able to go with any cloth diaper that I wasn‘t using for overnight. It does compare pretty well absorbency wise to the other prefolds that I have (GMD Infant Prefold).

 

PREFERENCES:
What did you like?
It was really soft compared to the GMD prefolds I have. I washed it daily and it didn’t seem to lose any of its softness over the time I had it.

What did you dislike?
Nothing I can think of.

What improvements would you like to see in this diaper?
Nothing I can think of.

Would you recommend it to a friend? Why or why not?
I would definitely recommend this because of how soft and absorbent it is.

PRICING:
Is the price fair? Too High?
Depending on the size your looking for, these are priced from $8-16 for a 3 pack. Personally for me this is kinda expensive for a prefold. I really like these, but at this price I wouldn’t be buying very many of them.

 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , | Leave a comment

HCB Review Team Reviews Peachy Green Solo Luxe AIO

20000101-061

I am so excited about this review!   Peachy Green Solo Luxe AIO’s are some of my very favorite diapers, so I feel like it is fitting to have them be the first review that some of the members of the Haute Clothed Buns Review Team present!    Although I’ve already posted a pretty thorough review of Peachy Green (PG) AIO’s, I wanted readers to be able to hear different perspectives and opinions, and I wanted viewers to be able to see how these diapers fit babies at various stages.

I’ll include a brief overview of the diaper, but this review will mostly focus on the HCB Review team’s individual experiences with the diaper on their baby.

Overview

 

OVERVIEW
Brand:  
Peachy Green
Type:  “Solo Luxe” All In One/Snap In One
Closure:  Side snaps
Sizing:  3 sizes:
Size 0 fits babies 7-16lbs (3.2-7.3kg) with a rise up to 15″ (38cm)
Size 1 fits babies 12-28lbs (5.5-12.7kg) with a rise up to 17.5″ (44.5cm)
Size 2 fits babies 24-35lbs (10.9-15.9kg) with a rise up to 19″ (48.3cm).
Materials:  Outer is waterproof PUL, Inner lining is Bamboo/Cotton viscose and the insert is Bamboo/Cotton fleece.
Price:  $22.95 for solid colors; $23.95 for prints
Colors & Prints:   A new variety of colors and prints are released each season.

Peachy Green’s Solo Luxe Product Description:

“Our all in one cloth diapers are great for baby. The organic cotton and bamboo viscose diaper inner is natural, organic, and easily washable and reusable. Snap diapers will not snag during cleaning, and side snaps give the all in one diaper a trim fit. Whether you call it an all in one, or snap in one because the soaker can snap out,  moms find this to be the best cloth diaper for their baby.”

Design

I am including some small images (without descriptions) of the Peachy Green AIO so you don’t have to refer back to the original review unless you want to check out the descriptions and see more pictures of the PG Solo Luxe AIO. :)

peachy green 005pg aio 104pg aio 055pg aio 065pg aio 088pg aio 058pg aio 080peachy green 017pg aio 014pg aio 089

 

pg aio 286Performance

Below you will find the individual evaluations from the HCB Review team, followed by photos of the diaper on their little one.

MISSY & Baby T; Peachy Green Solo Luxe Size 1
FIT

Record your child’s most recent stats: weight, approximate height, and age.  30 pounds/ 21 months

How does it fit through the rise?  On my 21 month old, the size 1 is getting a bit shorter in the rise, but it still covers everything it needs to.

Across the bum? Through the crotch?  Fits trim through the bum and crotch and isn’t bulky at all.

Around the thighs?   I like the way Peachy Green fit around the thighs. I can snap the hip snap on a larger setting but still snap the waist snap on a smaller setting to get the perfect fit for my child’s ever-changing shape.

Did you find this diaper to be trim? Average? Bulky? Peachy Green’s AIO is THE MOST TRIM diaper I’ve ever tried. It’s not bulky AT ALL. It’s my favorite to use when I want T to wear an outfit that he’s trying to outgrow. It’s really great under jeans. I’m not a fan of a fluffy cloth diapered bum.

Does the bulk hind or impede mobility in any way? Absolutely not. It’s very trim.

ABSORBENCY
Is your child a light, medium or heavy wetter? I would say he is maybe a medium wetter at this point.

Did the diaper leak? If so describe (where, was it recurring, etc.). It does leak if we go more than 3 hours between changes (like if we’re running errands). It usually leaks on the side-snapping wings area. Sometimes if he’s really mobile, it might wick in the front at the top if I don’t have everything tucked in properly.

Does the diaper work for daytime? Naptime? Overnight? Definitely daytime and possibly nighttime with a doubler of some sort. I, personally, wouldn’t want to risk it for overnight.

Did you need to add additional absorbency for naps or night? What did you use? have only used Peachy Green’s AIO for naps when T was smaller, and I just used a bamboo doubler. It worked pretty well.

How does it compare absorbency wise to other diapers you’ve used? A little less absorbent than others I’ve tried, but the trimness of the diaper keeps me coming back.

PREFERENCES
What did you like? Trimmest diaper I’ve tried

What did you dislike? Could be a little more absorbent at times.

What improvements would you like to see in this diaper? I wouldn’t mind seeing a stay dry material on the snap in inserts.

Would you recommend it to a friend? Why or why not?   Yes! We’ve loved our Peachy Green diapers. They are easy to get on, absorb well, and are very trim.

PRICING
Is the price fair? Too High? The price is fair in comparison to other diapers we have.

Fit

 

 

In the photos below, T is 30 pounds/ 21 months and wearing a size 1 Peachy Green Solo Luxe AIO (click on the image to see the photo full size) 
20130317-03020130317-02720130317-028

 

MICHELLE
Evaluation/Review of Peachy Green AIO (Size 2)

FIT
Record your child’s most recent stats: weight, approximate height, and age. 24mos, 36”, 33lbs

How does it fit through the rise? Across the bum? Through the crotch? Around the thighs?  Trim fit across the bum and crotch, snug (but not too snug) around the thighs. We currently are on the 2nd smallest snap for the waist, and 3rd for the thighs. The rise currently hits him right below the belly button.

Did you find this diaper to be trim? Average? Bulky?  Extremely trim

Does the bulk hind or impede mobility in any way?  No.

ABSORBENCY
Is your child a light, medium or heavy wetter?  Medium

Did the diaper leak? If so describe (where, was it recurring, etc.).  No.

Does the diaper work for daytime? Naptime? Overnight?  We use the diaper for both daytime and naptime. It is not absorbent enough for us to use as a nighttime diaper.

Did you need to add additional absorbency for naps or night? What did you use?  For naps, no. Average naps are 2-3 hours, and we can use just the insert with no leaks.

How does it compare absorbency wise to other diapers you’ve used?  This diaper is just as absorbent as some other AIOs we have tried (GroVia and Swaddlebees Simplex)

PREFERENCES
What did you like?  Natural fibers, absorbent with the insert only, but has the option to customize absorbency with a booster, extremely trim, made in the US.

What did you dislike? Nothing!

What improvements would you like to see in this diaper?  None at this time.

Would you recommend it to a friend? Why or why not?  I recommend this diaper to all of my friends! It is trim, natural fibers, available in a variety of prints and colors, absorbent, and the side snapping allows for a less bulky appearance under clothes.

PRICING
Is the price fair? Too High?  I feel the price is fair for what you get: a well constructed, natural fiber diaper made in the USA.

Fit

 

 

Baby J is wearing a size 2 Peachy Green AIO and is 24mos, 36”, 33lbs

20000101-17220000101-18320000101-18920000101-14220000101-116

20000101-01220000101-04920000101-052

SCARLETT & W

Evaluation/Review
FIT
Record your child’s most recent stats: weight, approximate height, and age. Wyatt, 15 months, 22lbs (80th percentile for height, cant remember number)

How does it fit through the rise? Across the bum? Through the crotch? Around the thighs?  Nice trim fit all around (he can wear size 1 on next to tightest snaps, and size 2 on tightest snaps (rise a bit high on the size 2 and a bit bulkier)

Did you find this diaper to be trim? Average? Bulky? Does the bulk hind or impede mobility in any way?  Trimmest diaper we own. No bulk for us at all. NO banana crotch.

ABSORBENCY
Is your child a light, medium or heavy wetter?  Wyatt is a heavy wetter and we use a hemp doubler every change. The absorbancy is NOT the best on this but decent with hemp.

Did the diaper leak? If so describe (where, was it recurring, etc.).  Without a hemp he wicks out the tabs in an hour; with hemp three hours no leaks.

Does the diaper work for daytime? Naptime? Overnight?  I use this as my daytime around the house dipe. Not overnight or out of house:)

Did you need to add additional absorbency for naps or night? What did you use?  Peachy hemp for every change.

How does it compare absorbency wise to other diapers you’ve used?

My BGE, Swaddlebees (now Blueberry Simplex), Primm & Proper and Smart bottoms are more absorbent, but peachy is trimmer.

PREFERENCES

What did you like? What did you dislike?  Love the trimmnest, wish they were more absorbent

What improvements would you like to see in this diaper?  Change the inner back to the BSB inner, and somehow have a more absorbant soaker

Would you recommend it to a friend? Why or why not?  Yes, b/c it is our favorite as far as trim and love the prints and solids

PRICING
Is the price fair? Too High?  Id say the price is fair, but recent quality issues need to be resolved:)

Fit

 

 

20130409-179444_10150958077538147_272705169_n20130409-318035_10150965381798147_1405863784_n20130409-547280_10150943074903147_166848089_n20130409-peach220130409-peach320130409-peach1

Fit

Kelly hasn’t had a chance to fill out the evaluation form, but she did send some awesome pictures of her adorable newborn daughter wearing size 0′s that I wanted you to be able to see.

Baby A, 3 wks. 21.5 inches. 9 lbs

20130224-photo

Baby A, Bright Star Baby (previous name/version of Peachy Green) sz 0. 1 month. 21.5 in. 10 lbs

20130305-photo (2)

Baby A, 2 mo. 23.5 in. 13.5 lbs

20130406-photo 120130406-photo 2 (2)20130406-photo 1 (2)20130406-photo 3

Conclusion

I hope you have enjoyed the reviews the HCB Review Team have shared.  If you have any questions, feel free to shoot us a question either in a comment here on the blog, through email (modmamma@googlemail.com) or on our Facebook Page.   Again, if you’d like to see more information or more detailed pictures of the design of the diaper, feel free to check out my original review here.

Peachy Green Solo Luxe AIO’s are available for purchase at several retailers as well as at peachygreendiapers.com  The links provided below are affiliate links, clicking through them to make your purchase helps to support this site and provides new diapers for the review team to review :)


 

 

Posted in Uncategorized | 1 Comment

Blueberry (Swaddlebees) Simplex OS vs. Redesigned bumGenius Elemental

20130310-DSC_6063

Overview

The quest to find the “perfect” one-size (OS) all in one (AIO) cloth diaper is challenging to say the least.  Each family has unique preferences and every baby’s shape is different which means that the perfect diaper for one baby may not be the best option for another baby.  In an endeavor to help you be successful in your quest for finding the perfect OS AIO for your situation, I’d like to compare the Blueberry (formerly Swaddlebees) Simplex to the bumGenius Elemental.

Both of these diapers are excellent and are some of the best thought out designs on the market.  They are both USA made and offer natural fiber inners.  You might think that two One Size, Natural fiber, Front Snapping All In one cloth diapers couldn’t be very different from each other, but they are.

Before we explore those differences, here’s a little comparison table that overviews the basics:

OS SimplexBG Elemental
BrandBlueberry/SwaddlebeesbumGenius
StyleAIO (All In One)AIO (All In One)
ClosureFront snappingFront Snapping
MaterialOuter: PUL; Inner: Birdseye CottonOuter: PUL; Inner: 100% organic cotton.
SizingFits most babies 10-35lbsFits most babies 8-35lbs
ManufacturedUSAUSA
Price$25.95; quantity discounts available$24.95; quantity discounts available

Appearance

20130310-DSC_6062If you just glance at the OS Simplex and the BG Elemental, your first impression would probably be that the two diapers are relatively similar.  When the are all snapped up, the only difference that is blatantly obvious is the leg opening.  If you were looking closely, you might notice that the wing tabs were a bit different.

In the following pictures, the OS Simplex is the “Butterflies” print and the New bumGenius Elemental is the aqua blue color, “Mirror.”

SMALLEST SIZE SETTING:  The two diapers below are snapped up to their smallest size.  As you can see, they are very similar in size at the smallest setting–even though bumGenius states that it should fit babies 8lbs and up at this setting and Simplex states 10+ and up.  My guess is that both diapers would start fitting best after the baby hits 10lbs or more.

On the left:  Front of diapers.  On the right: Back of diapers.
20130310-DSC_605620130310-DSC_6057

LARGEST SIZE SETTING.
Once again, both diapers look pretty similar in size.
On the left:  Front of diapers.  On the right: Back of diapers.20130310-DSC_604920130310-DSC_6051

FROM THE SIDE VIEW
Smallest size setting

20130310-DSC_6058Largest size setting
20130310-DSC_605320130310-DSC_6061Largest Size20130310-DSC_6055WIDTH OF THE CROTCH/STRIDE20130310-DSC_6054When laid side by side on the largest rise, the Simplex does appear to have a bit longer rise.
 However, the BGE is brand new, and the Simplex has been used, so it is possible that the elastic on the Simplex could be relaxed (although I don’t think that it is).20130310-DSC_6035INSIDE VIEW  I hope you’ll pardon my mistake here–I wasn’t thinking and took this inside comparison picture with the diapers on different rise settings.  That aside, you can see here the many differences on the inside, which we’ll explore in depth in the “Design” section.20130310-DSC_6040

 

Design

I noted above that the most significant differences between the OS Simplex and the New BG Elemental can be found in the interior design of the diaper.  However, there are a few differences in the outer design, the most significant being the type of elastic casing in the leg.

Outside

FRONT/Snaps  Once the diapers are fully unsnapped and laid side by side,  if you look closely, you’ll see that the OS Simplex has eight snaps that go across the front waist panel while the new BGE has 10 snaps.  Functionally, this means that that BGE is a little more customize-able.  As baby grows, the BGE will give you more flexibility in finding just the right setting.  However, in the long run, in probably won’t make a huge difference.

Both diapers also have rise snaps to convert the diaper so that it can be “small,” “medium,” and “large” and grow with your child from infant to 35lbs.

20130310-DSC_6036

For reference, I’ve laid the OS Simplex on top of the new BGE.  The front panel of the new BGE is significantly wider than the OS Simplex is.
20130310-DSC_6031BACK WAIST & WING TABS   The overall shape and design of the back waist is fairly similar between these two diapers.  At the top middle is the elastic.  Both diapers feature encased elastic.  The wingtabs where the snaps are located vary slightly however.

The bumGenius features tabs made from a different material that is attached to the tab (see the seam?).  The material is different from the rest of the diaper in that is has 4-way stretch; the PUL in the body of the diaper only stretches horizontally.  The stretchiness in the tabs enables you to get a better fit that you might otherwise.  Unlike the bumGenius, the OS Simplex tabs are from the same continuous piece of material that the rest of the outer diaper is made from.20130310-DSC_6025Close up of the wing tabs.  In addition to the construction of the tabs being different, you’ll also notice that the snaps of the OS Simplex are set a little closer to the edge than the snaps of the new BGE are.20130310-DSC_6027Remember how the front panel of the BGE was wider than the OS Simplex, well the opposite is true of the back.  When you lay the BGE on top of the Simplex, you can see that the OS Simplex is cut wider through the tabs  than the BGE.

20130310-DSC_6034

Comparison of the width through the crotch.  Since we’re comparing width, I thought you might be interested to see how the two diapers compare in width through the crotch (can I just say that I feel funny every review when I type that word!).  The OS Simplex is noticeably narrower than the new BGE, in part due to the rolled elastic casing.  Personally, I prefer the narrower widths because I’ve found them to look trimmer on my petite girl.  However, I do know that some parents prefer the wider widths because they feel like it gives them increased absorbency where it’s most needed and greater coverage for poopy diapers.  One reason why we need different styles of diapers–everyone has their preferences :) 20130310-DSC_6030LEG ELASTIC
One of the most significant differences between the OS Simplex and the new BGE is the style of leg elastic. The new BGE now has encased leg elastic.  Encased elastic basically is elastic that is placed inside a special channel/tube and is literally encased by the fabric surrounding.  In contrast, the OS Simplex sports “rolled elastic”  where the layers of the PUL, absorbent inner material and elastic are all sewn together, causing the elastic to roll inward.
20130310-DSC_604420130310-DSC_6029

In the picture below, you can see how the different style of elastic casings affect the leg closure.  The rolled elastic pulls the PUL of the Simplex inward and it usually tucks in.  The BGE however lays flat.20130310-DSC_6059

Each style of leg elastic has it’s benefits and drawbacks.  Some parents prefer the rolled elastic because they feel like it’s gentler on their babies thighs.  Other parents prefer the encased elastic because they find it to be more secure and/or it fits their baby better.  Occasionally, the inner cotton may try to poke out of a diaper with encased elastic, but I don’t usually have a problem with it.   In my opinion, neither style is superior to the other on it’s own; which one is best is simply a matter of your babies build.

 

Inside

 Something both diapers have in common, is a design that makes adding additional absorbency easy.    However, the interior designs of these two diapers could not be more different.  The new BGE has the organic cotton attached at either end of the diaper, but it is not attached through the crotch.  To add extra absorbency, you simply lift up the layers of the inserts, and add whatever type of doubler/insert you’d like.  The OS Simplex on the hand, has the cotton attached on the sides through the crotch area, but it is NOT attached at the end.  This way, it forms a pocket or tunnel that you can simply slip your favorite insert/doubler into if you need to increase the absorbency.

20130310-DSC_6047

Below:  Both diapers have synthetic material at the top, and then the absorbent inner starts about an inch down.  The reason for this type of design is to help prevent wicking. The other difference that is evident here is the amount of exposed PUL on the BGE vs. the absence of exposed PUL on the OS Simplex through the crotch area.20130310-DSC_6038

It’s easy to see the pocket opening of the Simplex in the picture below.
20130310-DSC_6041
Inside of the wing tabs.  20130310-DSC_6045Below is the inside front.  Again, you can see that the cotton lining is attached to the PUL at the top of the new BGE while it is NOT attached to the PUL at the top of the OS Simplex.

20130310-DSC_6042INSERTS
SIMPLEX:  For those unfamiliar with the design of the OS Simplex, here are some photos to help illustrate the unique pocket design.  At the end of the the pocket, a long snake style (long and narrow) soaker is attached.  One side is birdseye cotton, the other is lined with stay-dry microfleece.  This gives you the option to have either 100% cotton touching your baby’s bum, or stay material.  For parents who desire to use natural fibers but need or prefer their baby to have stay dry fabrics against the skin, this feature is really helpful, and not found in very many, if any other natural fiber diapers.

review diapers 0062Fold the insert over onto the TOP of the pocket and you’ve got super soft, stay-dry fleece to go against baby’s bum.  
review diapers 0105Slip the insert INTO the pocket and only natural fibers touch your little one’s skin.  Additionally, clean-up after a poopy diaper is a lot easier because you only  have to worry about cleaning it off of one layer of material instead of multiple layers.review diapers 0010

REDESIGNED BUM GENIUS ELEMENTAL
The absorbent material of the BG Elemental is comprised of two “inserts” of organic cotton, each one 3 layers thick and sewn all together.  Extra absorbency can be slipped underneath or in between the layers.  Cleaning poopy messes off the multiple layers can be a bit of a pain.  DSC_5056-1This is the BGE on the largest rise, and the inserts lay pretty flat.  20130310-DSC_6065Here the BGE is on the smallest rise and the inserts need to be folded under so they don’t bunch up too much.  DSC_4943-1

LEG ELASTIC  Although we’ve already discussed the differences in the styles of the leg elastic, I want you to see the difference it makes on the inside of the diaper and how it looks.

20130310-DSC_603920130310-DSC_6040There are several implications of the differences in the leg elastic.  First and most obvious is that the cotton lining IS attached to the outer PUL of the OS Simplex while the inside cotton on the NEW BGE does not come into contact with the outer PUL.  This may mean that the new BGE will be less likely to wick moisture since the absorbent material is not connected to the non-laminated (waterproof) side of the PUL.  It does mean though, that some of the exposed lamination on the PUL will come into contact with your baby’s skin.  For most babies, this won’t be an issue.  However, there are a small handful of babies whose sensitive skin cannot tolerate it.  Conversely, the cotton lining attached to the outer PUL of the Simplex means that it could possibly wick.  ***I would like to note here that while this is a possibility, in my personal experience of over 1 year of using the Simplex, wicking has seldom, if ever been an issue.***

Also, over the course of time, the OS Simplex will most likely develop wear holes along the legs from the friction of the leg rubbing against the natural fibers.   Before you jump ship though, realize that ALL natural fiber diapers are expected to develop holes especially in the spots where they receive the most friction and stress from wear and multiple washings.  If you want a diaper that will not get holes, you need to stick with synthetic materials (and even those will deteriorate, just at a slower rate).  Part of the reason bumGenius changed the design of their original Elemental from having rolled elastic to the current style seen here in the new Elemental, was to delay/reduce the occurence of holes.  Again, I would like to voice my opinion that this does not make one diaper superior to the other; it is a matter of preference and need.  Parents who do not want, or cannot have their baby’s skin touching PUL are going to prefer the design of the OS Simplex.  Parents who don’t mind exposed PUL may prefer the design of the BGE.

 

Sizing

Although there were several photographs in the initial section of this comparison that dealt with the size differences, I thought it would be helpful for you to see the difference of the cut and lengths of the new BGE vs. the OS Simplex.

SMALLEST RISE:  OS Simplex on Top of New BGE.   The Simplex appears to be a teensy bit longer through the rise than the BGE and significantly narrower, especially in the front.
20130310-DSC_6064LARGEST RISE:  OS Simplex on Top of New BGE.  Again, the Simplex appears to be longer than the BGE and is most definitely narrower through the front, crotch and bum.
20130310-DSC_6024
LARGEST RISE:  New BGE on Top of the OS Simplex.  As you can see, the OS Simplex is a bit longer, wider across the wings in the back, and narrower in the front.20130310-DSC_6033

Conclusion

 

In conclusion, I want to reiterate that I believe that both of these are excellent diapers and I would not hesitate to recommend either of them.  They are both excellent options for natural fiber AIO’s:  they are trim, very absorbent, dry fairly quickly, very easy to use and made well.  So, how do you decide?

The bumGenius Elemental is for you if you prefer:

  • Encased leg elastic
  • 100% Organic Cotton
  • A wider cut through the bum and crotch
  • No cotton attached to the outer PUL

You can find a complete review of the new BGE here.

The Blueberry One Size Simplex AIO is for you if you prefer:

  • Rolled leg elastic
  • No exposed PUL
  • The option for natural fiber OR stay dry material against baby’s bum.
  • A narrower cut through the leg and across the bum.

You can find a complete review of the OS Simplex here.

I hope that you have found this comparison helpful in your decision making process!  If I left any questions unanswered  or if you’re still not sure what is right for you, I would love to hear from you!  Please feel free to comment below, or contact me via email (modmamma @ googlemail dot com) or on my Facebook Page.  ***Both the diapers in this review were purchased by me.  I have not received any compensation for this comparison.  These are my honest opinions.***

giveawayI am SO very thankful for the generosity of  Christina at theclothmenagerie.com for graciously contacting me and offering to sponsor a giveaway of a brand new Blueberry OS Simplex!  Be sure to check out her online store and become a FB fan :)

To celebrate and support “The Great Cloth Diaper Change” The Cloth Menagerie will be offering 10% off all purchases with the coupon code: CHANGE April 1st – 30th!
Medium_logo

a Rafflecopter giveaway

Posted in bumGenius Elemental vs. Blueberry OS Simplex, Cloth Diaper Comparisons | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 73 Comments